In many cases, the three-dimensional structure of a protein molecule contains several distinguishable domains, which may again contain subdomains. The shape, the size and the location of these domains and subdomains are determined by the way that the protein molecule is folded. The structure of a protein molecule could be described in terms of domains even when the structure data is only at low resolution. In this study, the three-dimensional shape of a protein molecule is represented by an isosurface of the electron density of the molecular system. Domains are the basic graphic objects involved in the generation of the surface.
For a supermacromolecular system such as the actin filament,
suppose that there are N protein molecules bound to
each other and that
the molecule contains
domains (
).
The position of molecule
can be described by a
three-dimensional vector
.
The position of the domains in molecule
with respect to
can be described
by a set of vectors
(
).
In a given orthogonal coordinate system with a unit vector set
{
}, the position vector of domain
in molecule
can be expressed as:
We assume that the electron distribution of each domain can
be approximated by a three dimensional Gaussian function and that
the electron density function of the whole system equals to
the summation of the contributions from every individual domains.
In other words, the electron density of the supermacromolecular
system can be expressed as a function of the space vector
(
):
where is a normalization constant and the parameters
, and
are the dimensional measurements of domain
in molecule
along the directions
, and
, respectively.
The isosurface of the electron density of the molecular system is drawn
according to the following procedure in general:
(1) calculate vectors
and
based on the current structural
understandings of the
molecular system; (2) specify parameters
, and
based on the measurements of the domains and the bound connections between
them; (3) if possible, calculate the alterations on
,
,
, and
corresponding to the distortion on the shape of domains during the
configurational change of each molecule;
(4) determine the threshold value of the electron density
for an isosurface of Eq. (4);
(5) calculate the vertices of and the surface normals of the
isosurface according to an appropriate algorithm
such as the ``marching cubes''
;
(6) draw the isosurface by using vertex subroutines in
SGI Graphics Library
;
(7) if possible,
compare the calculated image with the 3-dimensional reconstruction
data of electron microscopy;
(8) repeat steps (2) to (7) until a
satisfactory representation is reached.
The F-actin helix can be regarded
as a two-stranded structure
with a half-pitch of about 37 nm
and a diameter of 9 to 10 nm.
Electron microscopy and three-dimensional
reconstruction techniques have been used
to visualize the geometric shape of
real F-actin filaments.
The bulk of the actin monomer is about
5.5
5.5
3.5
and is composed of two domains.
The `large' inner domain contains subdomains 3 and 4,
whereas the `small' outer domain contains subdomains 1 and
2. The long axis of the monomer lies roughly perpendicular
to the filament axis
.
The myosin subfragment 1 binding sites
lies on subdomain-1 of actin
.
The myosin head approaches the actin filament
tangentially and
binds to a single actin.
The graphic representation of F-actin is constructed
based on a reduced atomic model.
The electron density of
each of the four subdomains in an actin monomer is
approximated
by a 3-dimensional Gaussian function.
The parameters
,
and
are determined based on the mass of the
subdomains and the putative bonds between them.
The density function of the F-actin at a given point
is then calculated according to Eq. (4).
We assume that the contribution to the density function
from actin mononers that
lie beyond the five nearest ones are negligible.
Therefore, in the calculation of Eq. (4), we only consider
the 20 subdomains in the five nearest actin molecules.
A simplified algorithm is used here to calculate
the isosurface. In a cylindrical coordinate
system {},
we let the
axis of the coordinate system coincide
with the helical axis of the F-actin filament.
The vertices of the isosurface is determined by searching
values for all
that have positive surface normals.
In order to make an efficient rendering,
surface coordinates of F-actin are written into
a data file and the
distortions on the shape of actin monomer
caused by the binding of myosin head is
ignored.
Similar approach is also used to create
the three dimensional shape of myosin
subfragment 1 based on the recent structural data.
The vertices data
of the myosin head is recorded. Myosin heads are
placed to the binding sites on actin monomers
by applying translations and rotations on the recorded
vertices data.
A graphic representation of the
binding of myosin S1 to F-actin is
shown in
Fig. 4.
A tropomyosin molecule is about 41 nm long
and is almost a fully -helical
coiled coil
.
Based on the X-ray results
,
together with analysis of amino
acid sequence periodicities, more detailed structural
information can be inferred.
Tropomyosin molecules form
head-to-tail connections and each
tropomyosin molecule appears to display a set of
discreted binding sites
that permit weak linkages of the
flexible tropomyosin filament to F-actin
along the long-pitch
helical strands
.
A recent three-dimensional reconstruction of
thin filament electron micrographs confirms
that a movement of tropomyosin on thin filament
occurs upon the binding of
to
TnC
.
In our graphic representation, tropomyosin is
approximated by flexible coiled tubes.
Each tropomyosin molecule cover seven actin sites
(
Fig. 5).
The bind of a myosin head to an actin site can change the
tropomyosin position locally around the actin site as well
as that around the first-, second-, and third-nearest
neighboring actin sites
(Fig. 5).
The exact position of the tropomyosin at a certain
actin site is determined by the configurations
of the actin site, the first-, second- and third-nearest
neighbors of the actin site,
and the nearest troponin molecule.
Troponin, a -sensitive complex,
has three subunits: TnC, TnI and TnT.
TnT binds one troponin complex to each
tropomyosin molecule at intervals 38 nm along F-actin.
The troponin complex has an elongated
shape with TnC and TnI forming a globular ``head''
region and TnT a long ``tail''
.
A X-ray structure study
indicated
that the amino-terminal tail end of TnT spans
the head-to-tail joint of tropomyosin filaments,
and that the head region of the troponin complex
binds about 20 nm away near residues 150-180 of the
tropomyosin molecule.
Although many aspects about the structure of
troponin and its binding to actin
remain ambiguous, a simple graphic representation
is proposed (
Fig. 6).
As shown in Fig. 6,
there are two stable states for each troponin molecule: one
corresponds to -bound TnC
and the other corresponds to non-
-bound TnC.
Putting the above graphic representations together,
we can see that
the states of the automata array at any given time step
can be directly mapped into the geometric shapes of
protein configurations
(
Fig. 7).
A dynamic simulation can thus be viewed in a form of
video images. This allows us to
investigate various processes on thin filaments
not only in temporal and spatial dimensions,
but also from the structural perspective.
For example, the dynamic simulation of thin filaments
shown in
Fig. 3
can be represented as
a three-dimensional
graphic animation.
Fig. 8
shows a sequence of video images corresponding to
the evolution of the automata array from time
step 110 to 121 in
(Fig. 3).
The length of the time step in the simulation is
1 to 10 ms [1].
The diffusion processes of myosin heads and
particles
in the solution as seen in Fig. 8 are simulated by an
three-dimensional cellular automaton with
a set of collision and movement rules that will be discussed in
separate papers.
The simulation of the diffusion of myosin heads and calcium
particles was coupled with the simulation
of thin filaments through an interface control and
displayed by the animation program.